Hello Guest

33. 10.50 or 33, 12.50?

  • 12 Replies
  • 3324 Views

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

*

Offline trizacker

  • 37
  • 0
  • Every Cowboy needs a SIDEKICK!!
33. 10.50 or 33, 12.50?
« on: April 11, 2005, 02:16:37 AM »
whats better on a tracker with out snapping axles?  ???

*

Offline ed oorklep

  • 637
  • 0
  • Gender: Male
  • 1992 Suzuki Vitara
    • Suzuki Vitara 4x4
Re: 33. 10.50 or 33, 12.50?
« Reply #1 on: April 11, 2005, 03:57:06 AM »
No Idea, I have 33*12.50 but no terrai experience with them yet   :'(
http://www.suzukivitara4x4.nl
1992 Suzuki Vitara
8cm Body-lift, 33 12.5 R15 General Grabber MT's.
ARB Bull Bar.
3" Suspension lift.

*

Offline tracker8wr

  • 568
  • 0
  • Gender: Male
  • THE BIGGER THE BETTER
    • my home page
Re: 33. 10.50 or 33, 12.50?
« Reply #2 on: April 11, 2005, 05:24:35 AM »
not really that bigg of a differance in causing breakage but u may want to consider the wider tire to better ur chances of getting through mud. i know some people say run skinny to get to the hard bottom but alot of mud has been run through with 44" and larger tires i don't think that a 33" tire can dig to the bottom of that. to further my point i contact the head developer of superswamper tires and he told me that a wider tire has a better chance of getting through the mud due to a larger contact surface and that a fat tire will eventually dig down anyway.
« Last Edit: April 11, 2005, 05:25:36 AM by tracker8wr »
4 1/2 body
Coil spacers
cheap but effective
31" LTB Swampers
http://www.geocities.com/race8thwonder01/ http://www.cardomain.com/memberpage/769479

*

Offline Natebert

  • 1098
  • 0
  • Gender: Male
Re: 33. 10.50 or 33, 12.50?
« Reply #3 on: April 11, 2005, 06:22:26 AM »
Don't forget rotating mass and wind resistance.

Larger tires have more of both which affects a lot of different things like milage, acceleration, brakage and breakage.

I think the float vs dig-in arguement is pretty neglable once you get into a larger tire, on our light trucks.

I guess  it depends on your primary terrain of off-roading.

~Nate


*

Offline Rhinoman

  • 4502
  • 36
  • Gender: Male
  • Bend it, Break it, Fix it
    • Rhinoman
Re: 33. 10.50 or 33, 12.50?
« Reply #4 on: April 11, 2005, 09:53:50 AM »
I haven't tried a 33 x10.5 but I had to do a fair bit of cutting for 33 x 9.5s on a 7" rim with 95mm backspacing. I did offer up my 33x12.5s (10" rim 105mm bs - I think) and they would have needed a LOT more cutting. The 33 x 9.5s have loads more grip anyway because the footprint is much longer. I don't need arch extensions either. The more grip you have the more your chances of breaking stuff due to transmission wind up.
2000 Vitara 1.6, 3+3 Lift, 33"MTs, 5:83s, LWB brakes, Winch, Snorkel, Safari Rack
1986 SJ413K PickUp, 1.6L conversion.

OBD1 - Full diagnostics on a PC/Laptop: http://www.rhinopower.org

*

Offline 1bigtracker

  • 3409
  • 1
  • Gender: Male
  • F*** trail rated, try trail tested
Re: 33. 10.50 or 33, 12.50?
« Reply #5 on: April 11, 2005, 12:07:14 PM »
i have 34/9.50's and i really can't wait to find some 33/12.50 to try and just see how it all works out.  i really would like to try some 33/15.5 Swamper TSL SX's :o ;D

stu
   

*

Offline DirtDevil

  • 317
  • 0
  • Gender: Male
  • Island4x4.com
Re: 33. 10.50 or 33, 12.50?
« Reply #6 on: April 11, 2005, 12:49:49 PM »
wide tires + light truck = bad   skinny tires + light truck = good! .... im runnin a set of 32, 7's, work better than any wide tire... widest Id want to go are 10.50's on a suzuki
Sj410 Full exo, Locked, race buckets, 5 point
85.5 LWB sami, Toy axles, locked rear, CJ/RUF, warn 8000, 33's

*

Offline 92Sidekick4x4

  • 1456
  • 0
  • Gender: Male
  • Spencer Atkinson, 92Sidekick4x4
Re: 33. 10.50 or 33, 12.50?
« Reply #7 on: April 11, 2005, 06:32:34 PM »
Quote
wide tires + light truck = bad   skinny tires + light truck = good! .... im runnin a set of 32, 7's, work better than any wide tire... widest Id want to go are 10.50's on a suzuki


yup

my lug nuts require more torque then my engine makes ;)

*

Offline Gary_Hill

  • 288
  • 0
  • Gender: Male
Re: 33. 10.50 or 33, 12.50?
« Reply #8 on: April 11, 2005, 07:59:54 PM »
wide tires + light truck = bad   skinny tires + light truck = good! .... im runnin a set of 32, 7's, work better than any wide tire... widest Id want to go are 10.50's on a suzuki

I second that YUP...better for tire to slip than for axle to break. Tire slips ...change your line or change gears or get a running start. You can try all three faster than you can replace an axle...

*

Offline Natebert

  • 1098
  • 0
  • Gender: Male
Re: 33. 10.50 or 33, 12.50?
« Reply #9 on: April 12, 2005, 03:36:51 AM »
Quote
wide tires + light truck = bad   skinny tires + light truck = good! .... im runnin a set of 32, 7's, work better than any wide tire... widest Id want to go are 10.50's on a suzuki

I second that YUP...better for tire to slip than for axle to break. Tire slips ...change your line or change gears or get a running start. You can try all three faster than you can replace an axle...



I'll join in here with another Yup.

*

Offline biker

  • 730
  • 7
  • Gender: Male
  • It's a sickness I tell ya
Re: 33. 10.50 or 33, 12.50?
« Reply #10 on: April 12, 2005, 05:02:29 PM »
I just put some new shoes on mine about a week ago. After much thought and research and coming up with 1 tire narrower than 10". I decided to go to 235/85r16 on 16x7 rims. HOLY CRAP do they dig, I'm going places at street pressure that were giving me trouble aired down with my 31x10.5's. Here is a link to some pics, sorry there is a few to sort through. http://spaces.msn.com/members/duanesplace/
94 Kick with bigger tires
99 Vitara 2wd
10 Gr Vitara

*

Offline BEETLE-TRIZ

  • 17
  • 0
  • I love YaBB 1G - SP1!
Re: 33. 10.50 or 33, 12.50?
« Reply #11 on: April 22, 2005, 02:50:28 AM »
alright guys thanx alot for youre insight i have factored all of your input into one answer 33-10.5 but im noly gonna get an allterrain tire no boggers

*

Offline HUMZUKI

  • 117
  • 0
  • Gender: Male
  • Fool!
Re: 33. 10.50 or 33, 12.50?
« Reply #12 on: April 22, 2005, 05:12:36 AM »
Quote
whats better on a tracker with out snapping axles?  ???



Biger is better,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,for snapping axles ;D