Hello Guest

XL7 vs 4Runner

  • 6 Replies
  • 8058 Views

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

*

Offline olija

  • 770
  • 2
  • Gender: Male
    • Check out my cardomain
XL7 vs 4Runner
« on: July 06, 2016, 05:59:50 PM »
Hey guys, long time no see. A little background info: I used to frequent these forums between 7 and 10 years ago when I owned a great little 1997 4door Sidekick and later a 2001 4door Vitara. I ended up frustrated with the Vitara after numerous blown struts, a cracked front diff housing, and then 4 or 5 blown CV axles after replacing the diff with a steel V6 one. Anyways, after getting sick of wrenching on my rig all the time due to a poorly designed suspension lift and lack of aftermarket support, I sold the Vitara and switched to a 2004 Tacoma xtracab. I still have the Tacoma right now but am planning on selling it in the near future. It has served me very well and even after wheeling it moderately hard for the last 6 years it hasn't cost me much to run at all. I always missed the nimble, fun size and weight of the Suzukis, and also the ability to haul passengers comfortably, as the xtracab is barely adequate for toddlers let alone adults. Due to a growing family situation (back then I was single, now I'm married and have our first child on the way), I'm looking for a 7 passenger 4wd SUV that has off-road capability similar to the Tacoma. Seems overkill to go for a 7-passenger right away, right? But I feel it's easier to justify spending money on mods for a vehicle if you plan to keep it for a long time (thinking next 10 years possibly). A 5 passenger SUV is really only good for 2 adults and 2 kids in car seats, so I think we would probably outgrow that pretty quickly and then need to upsize again.

Right now I'm looking at the following 3 options: 1999-2006 Suzuki XL7, 2003-2009 Toyota 4Runner, 2006-2010 Jeep Commander. After doing a bit of research I'm not too keen on the Jeep, I've basically ruled it out, mainly due to poor build quality and poor fuel mileage.

The 4runner looks best for my requirements.
Pros: It has either a punchy v6 or a v8, both reliable engines as far as anyone knows. It comes with traction control and other electronic goodies I don't really care about. It is available with 7 seats; the 3rd row models are not that easy to find though, and the seats don't fold flat into the floor, they hang off to the sides and take up space there. My experience with Toyota vehicles has been really good, I also really appreciate the wide range of aftermarket support for them after being essentially on my own with the 2001 Vitara.
Cons: 1)It's only available as an automatic. 2)It has alot of overly complicated systems like traction control, vehicle skid control, hill-start assist, and downhill assist control. I don't really need that, I know how to drive and prefer the old school way of wheeling as opposed to pushing a button and letting the computer do everything for me. 3) No possibility of retrofitting manual hubs to it. 4) Expensive- the cheapest one I've found was around $8000 CDN, with high mileage. A clean one with lower mileage can go for as much as $15,000 which is over what I'm willing to pay. I'd say $10,000 tops but even that's a little on the high side. 5) Push button 4wd- lame, bound to leave me stranded one day.

The XL7 on the other hand, doesn't really LOOK like it's cut out for the job at first glance, but it's got potential to be a contender for thousands less $$$.

Pros: 1) Available with 5 speed manual, AND a lever-shifted t-case, and it's possible to install manual hubs easily 2) Much more affordable off the lot, most expensive one I've seen is the same price as the cheapest 4Runner. Leaves some money left over to build it up a bit. 3) Rear seats fold almost flat into the floor 4) I'd say it's slightly more unique, although I don't see a ton of 4th gen 4runners out there either. 5) Easily re-gearable once larger tires are installed, just swap pumpkins from an automatic in

Cons: 1) Considerably less off-road worthy out of the box. Small tires, no skid plating except the fuel tank, low clearance. Needs a 2" lift and 2" body lift and 30-31" tires just to keep up to an stock 4runner. My 2001 Vitara was the same way, but at least it had a shorter wheelbase. The Xl7 has the exact same 110" wheelbase as a 4th gen 4runner. 2) Limited aftermarket support, even though it's been around longer. 3) No dealerships for genuine parts in North America. 4) Even though it has 100 less horsepower and weighs hundreds of pounds less, it gets the same fuel economy as the v6 4runner 5) About 4" narrower body than the 4runner. Could be an issue fitting child seats in the back. 6) This is kind of the same as #2, but you can't even source an aftermarket winch bumper for it in North America! And there are no lockers available for it.

So...my question is. What would you do if you were in my situation? Buy a Zook for thousands less and modify it to get it up to par and risk making it finicky and unreliable by overdoing it? Or spend big money on a Yota and leave it close to stock?

My ideal XL7 would be a pre-2004 (don't like that facelift), with the Rocky-Road 2.5" spring&spacer lift, plus 2" body lift, full skidplating, an aftermarket front bumper, rock sliders or at least step bars, and whatever size tires can fit under there. I'd love to stick with 15" wheels and run a 30x9.5 or 31x10.5, otherwise if it's gotta be 16" I'd try either 245/75R16 or 235/85R16 or 215/85R16. My wheeling typically involves tight-ish trails on mountainous terrain, lots of old mining and logging tracks, camping in the boondocks, etc. Not looking to beat the crap out of something I want to keep nice, but not afraid to scratch it in the event that things get a little sideways.
97 Sidekick 4door 5 speed, 1.5 spacer lift, 2" body lift, CJ rims, locked rear, 31's, 4:1 low <SOLD>
01 Vitara 2.0L 5 speed, 2.5" Calmini lift, 2" body lift, Sidekick rims, locked rear, 31's, 4:1 low, 5.13 diffs <SOLD>
03 XL7 2.7 5 speed, 4.5" AE lift with OME springs, 2" AE body lift, 5.13 diffs, 3:1 low, 235/80R17 BFG AT's on Ultra 17x8 with 1" spacers, skid plates, Balmer Fab front bumper

*

Offline olija

  • 770
  • 2
  • Gender: Male
    • Check out my cardomain
Re: XL7 vs 4Runner
« Reply #1 on: July 06, 2016, 06:17:28 PM »
Something along these lines perhaps. This one obviously has a body lift and is running 245/75R16's:



97 Sidekick 4door 5 speed, 1.5 spacer lift, 2" body lift, CJ rims, locked rear, 31's, 4:1 low <SOLD>
01 Vitara 2.0L 5 speed, 2.5" Calmini lift, 2" body lift, Sidekick rims, locked rear, 31's, 4:1 low, 5.13 diffs <SOLD>
03 XL7 2.7 5 speed, 4.5" AE lift with OME springs, 2" AE body lift, 5.13 diffs, 3:1 low, 235/80R17 BFG AT's on Ultra 17x8 with 1" spacers, skid plates, Balmer Fab front bumper

*

Offline beagle..t

  • 1239
  • 16
  • Gender: Male
Re: XL7 vs 4Runner
« Reply #2 on: July 08, 2016, 03:03:16 PM »
IMO I would go Suzuki  I had a xl-7 and it was too long for the trails I like but putting just about everything from it into my 2dr. Toyota I think are over priced and high mileage where xl-7 are very reasonable in price and everyone is starting to make more and more aftermarket parts for these now 
new rig aka "the mule" 2002 tracker
V6 swap auto  ,2 dr ,2" BL,2" jeffs kit 512 gears warn hubs and 30/9.5/15 BFG AT

*

Offline nprecon

  • 2318
  • 52
  • Gender: Male
  • ONWARD... through the fog!
Re: XL7 vs 4Runner
« Reply #3 on: July 08, 2016, 07:34:27 PM »
I was recently looking for a vehicle that would haul six or seven persons comfortably too, but for different reasons.  I liked the FJs, but they couldn't seat five comfortably.  I narrowed my search down to the 4Runner or the Toyota Sequoia. 

There is little comparison between these two in size.  The Sequoia dwarfs the 4Runner.  But, like you, I have no interest AT ALL in all of the "we'll do it for you" features in a world where half the people can't drive properly to start with.  The last thing poor drivers need is more technology "crutches" to enable their lack of driving skills.  Plus, the cost of new Sequoias is off the charts.  I then started looking at the pre-'98 Sequioas that came with the 4.7 liter V8.  The 4.7 liter is a tried and true engine design that will last for hundreds of thousands of miles if maintained.  BUT... even though the pre-98 Sequoias had solid rear axles, their off-road ability (after market support, their size and weight) would somewhat limit their off-road worthiness.

So... it took me back to the 4Runner.  As you stated, they have a lot of aftermarket support, they are reliable, and are off-road worthy.  Still, you will only have a true six-seater vehicle, even with the third row seats, which get in the way of cargo space.  Two adults and a car seat in the second row would be really tight.

In the end, after a lot of research, I dropped both the Sequoia and the 4Runner from my list (sadly) BECAUSE where I live (midwest) Toyota still has a a serious problem with frame and suspension rust that will put these trucks in the bone yard early.  Where you are may be a far different story, but, I'm in the rust belt.  I'm not paying new prices for a four year old 4Runner with 60K miles and I'm not buying an older one that looks great from the curb, but is rotting apart in the frame.

I think the Suzuki XL-7 would carry just as many persons as comfortably as the 4Runner and despite Suzuki abandoning the North American automobile sales market, MOST hi-wear parts are still available within the aftermarket vendors or from Suzuki parts direct.  For less money, and with a little of the wrench knowledge you already gained from owning one earlier, if you could find a good, low mileage early model XL-7 It would probably serve you well.
'02 Chezuki Tracker with a 2 Liter and 5spd.  It works for me!!!

*

Offline olija

  • 770
  • 2
  • Gender: Male
    • Check out my cardomain
Re: XL7 vs 4Runner
« Reply #4 on: July 17, 2016, 07:25:37 PM »
Thanks for the replies, guys. I'm still not decided but I am feeling a little bit more leaned toward the Suzuki side of things. I asked the same question over on a Toyota forum I'm on for my FJ62, and pretty much all of them said just buy a Lexus GX470 cause it's even better than a 4Runner. Well, that wasn't even part of the question!

I just want to bounce some build ideas off you now and see if anyone has any suggestions on how to do things better.

I'd be looking for a 2001-2003 XL7 (don't want the 2004-2006 facelifted style with the push-button 4wd), 2.7L v6, 5 speed manual, lever-shift 4wd, steel front diff housing. I want to swap the diff pumpkins from an auto-tranny-equipped XL7 so I can change the ratio from 4.62 to 5.13 and compensate for the larger tires I plan to run. Is it possible to run manual hubs from a Sidekick on an XL7? I know on my Vitara it was a simple swap but I'm not sure if the XL uses the same CV's.

I want to do the Rocky-Road/OME 2.5" lift, plus a 2" body lift, so I can run 31x10.5R15's. I want to avoid Calmini due to the bad experience I had with my Vitara with their kit. My friends have a 2004 Vitara V6 that they managed to fit some generic 15" steel wagon wheels on. I also had 15" Sidekick wheels on my old 2001 Vitara. So I've established it's possible to fit 15's on a Vitara, but what about on an XL7? Do they use the same calipers? If it's not possible to run a 15" rim, is it possible to fit a 235/85/16 or would I have to settle for a 245/75/16? I don't mind doing some trimming if it's worth the extra clearance. Also, are there any aftermarket flares that work on the XL7?

Another thought I had was the frame chop idea as seen in "Project ZR3" on the homepage. I'd imagine it's very similar between a Vitara and an XL7. I wouldn't be able to do the chop and weld myself, but I'd be interested in seeing if the local welding shop would do it and for how much. It seems like an effective way to open the front end up for more clearance because if you needed more, you could still add spacers.
« Last Edit: July 17, 2016, 07:29:24 PM by olija »
97 Sidekick 4door 5 speed, 1.5 spacer lift, 2" body lift, CJ rims, locked rear, 31's, 4:1 low <SOLD>
01 Vitara 2.0L 5 speed, 2.5" Calmini lift, 2" body lift, Sidekick rims, locked rear, 31's, 4:1 low, 5.13 diffs <SOLD>
03 XL7 2.7 5 speed, 4.5" AE lift with OME springs, 2" AE body lift, 5.13 diffs, 3:1 low, 235/80R17 BFG AT's on Ultra 17x8 with 1" spacers, skid plates, Balmer Fab front bumper

*

Offline olija

  • 770
  • 2
  • Gender: Male
    • Check out my cardomain
Re: XL7 vs 4Runner
« Reply #5 on: August 08, 2016, 09:33:04 PM »
I've been doing my research and keeping an eye on the used market. It's definitely going to be hard to find a 5-speed manual XL7 with 7 seats in Canada, but I think it will be worth the wait. I also found out that it is possible to convert a 5-passenger XL7 to a 7-passenger, easier than it would be to convert a 5-passenger 4Runner to a 7-passenger. Found this cool Russian video on youtube, it's a 3rd gen 4runner (I'm interested in 4th gen which most people would say is LESS capable than 3rd gen) wheeling with an XL7, looks like the XL7 holds its own quite well.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lrAqCxOd_48
97 Sidekick 4door 5 speed, 1.5 spacer lift, 2" body lift, CJ rims, locked rear, 31's, 4:1 low <SOLD>
01 Vitara 2.0L 5 speed, 2.5" Calmini lift, 2" body lift, Sidekick rims, locked rear, 31's, 4:1 low, 5.13 diffs <SOLD>
03 XL7 2.7 5 speed, 4.5" AE lift with OME springs, 2" AE body lift, 5.13 diffs, 3:1 low, 235/80R17 BFG AT's on Ultra 17x8 with 1" spacers, skid plates, Balmer Fab front bumper

*

Offline nprecon

  • 2318
  • 52
  • Gender: Male
  • ONWARD... through the fog!
Re: XL7 vs 4Runner
« Reply #6 on: August 21, 2016, 07:06:14 PM »
Great video of some great trail driving.
'02 Chezuki Tracker with a 2 Liter and 5spd.  It works for me!!!