Hello Guest

more power for sidekick

  • 20 Replies
  • 6567 Views

0 Members and 8 Guests are viewing this topic.

more power for sidekick
« on: March 30, 2010, 07:49:57 AM »
i have a 1996 sidekick sport with the 1.8.plenty of power in town but just took it on a road trip from portland to sacramento and it could use some more power for the mountain passes. what mods do these motors respond well to? it is completely stock now and 33s are in its future, as well as a gear swap.

*

Offline bentparts

  • *
  • 4536
  • 60
  • Gender: Male
  • I'd rather be Blown AND Injected.
    • mikekallie's flickr photos
Re: more power for sidekick
« Reply #1 on: March 30, 2010, 04:01:35 PM »
Well, gears for sure will help, but the only real power adders would be different for the 1.8 compared to the 1.6. There doesn't seem to be much in the way of performance stuff geared to the 1.8. You could try the standard stuff, K+N air filter, a good header and muffler, maybe a larger exhaust system ( 2/ or 2/14" tubing) Those thing usually benefit any engine and seem to bring the 16v to life.
Then there's always turbocharging.
The usual stuff, and 2nd generation Air to liquid intercooled TURBOCHARGER

Re: more power for sidekick
« Reply #2 on: March 30, 2010, 04:29:55 PM »
ya i have a turbo from a subaru loyal 1.8 laying around. hmmm.

*

Offline idaholwb

  • 772
  • 2
  • Gender: Male
  • And that's the way the metal crumpled!
Re: more power for sidekick
« Reply #3 on: March 31, 2010, 08:41:50 PM »
 Just put a 2.0 from a newer Vitara or Tracker in it... You'll be amazed at the difference it makes. It's like putting a V6 in it... Almost... I did that to the last Sport I had with a manual and had 32" tires under it... The engine didn't even notice the bigger tires going down the freeway. I could easily do 95 in it with the A/C on, till I had to slow down for traffic that is...
97 Sport
265/70-16s
2" lift
2.0 swap
I know...Pretty boring... FOR NOW...

Re: more power for sidekick
« Reply #4 on: April 03, 2010, 12:46:24 PM »
Drop in a 2.7.  At 95 I'm still pressed back against the seat....

*

Bobthebiker

Re: more power for sidekick
« Reply #5 on: April 04, 2010, 04:35:21 AM »
a new full exhaust with a good header, high flow cat, and muffler,  different cam(s)  port and polish,    each are good.   I wouldnt touch k&crap filters with a 50 foot pole personally.  you have to sacrifice filtration to gain flow, its just simple physics. 

beyond this, turbocharging is the next logical step, but generally you want forged rods and pistons to hold up to the power sufficiently.

*

Offline yellow2000S/R

  • 152
  • 2
  • Gender: Male
Re: more power for sidekick
« Reply #6 on: April 04, 2010, 10:09:41 AM »
a new full exhaust with a good header, high flow cat, and muffler,  different cam(s)  port and polish,    each are good.   I wouldnt touch k&crap filters with a 50 foot pole personally.  you have to sacrifice filtration to gain flow, its just simple physics. 

beyond this, turbocharging is the next logical step, but generally you want forged rods and pistons to hold up to the power sufficiently.

This.

Just make sure you do a compression test to make sure its worth the head work. I got my head all done and my rings are shot. 90, 92, 75,  107 for the numbers. Dropped in some oil and it bumped up to 125+ across all of them.

When I fix the ring issues it should be real nice power improvement and I have a turbo off a Saab to go on it.

*

Offline bentparts

  • *
  • 4536
  • 60
  • Gender: Male
  • I'd rather be Blown AND Injected.
    • mikekallie's flickr photos
Re: more power for sidekick
« Reply #7 on: April 05, 2010, 03:22:23 PM »
a new full exhaust with a good header, high flow cat, and muffler,  different cam(s)  port and polish,    each are good.   I wouldnt touch k&crap filters with a 50 foot pole personally.  you have to sacrifice filtration to gain flow, its just simple physics. 

beyond this, turbocharging is the next logical step, but generally you want forged rods and pistons to hold up to the power sufficiently.

Are you actually saying this from your previous experience in scientific testing or just some crap you heard on the net? I've been using K+N Air filters for several huindred thousand miles on two of my 4 wheel vehicles and on my Custom 1988 FLH harley for 70,000 miles. I've done top end tear down and inspection on the Harley and it looks brand new inside, and no visable or MEASURABLE wear on the cylinders. Seems they work just fine in the Turbo Tracker too.

I'm also TURBOCHARGED on the STOCK rods and pistons, liquid to air intercooled, and have been for over 30,000 miles without a problem. Keep the boost below 6lbs and your golden. Just ask anyone who's riddin in mine, it's plenty quick and RELIABLE.
The usual stuff, and 2nd generation Air to liquid intercooled TURBOCHARGER

Re: more power for sidekick
« Reply #8 on: April 05, 2010, 08:57:09 PM »
who makes a header for the s1.8? thinking abou the 2.0. my motor all of a sudden went through 5 quarts of oil on a recent road trip. did this over about 5 hours, no leaks. kinda baffled. pcv valve was bad but so far thats all i have found and it has not used oil since. definately adding oil presure gadge, hate the stupid lights.

*

Bobthebiker

Re: more power for sidekick
« Reply #9 on: April 06, 2010, 08:22:36 AM »
a new full exhaust with a good header, high flow cat, and muffler,  different cam(s)  port and polish,    each are good.   I wouldnt touch k&crap filters with a 50 foot pole personally.  you have to sacrifice filtration to gain flow, its just simple physics. 

beyond this, turbocharging is the next logical step, but generally you want forged rods and pistons to hold up to the power sufficiently.

Are you actually saying this from your previous experience in scientific testing or just some crap you heard on the net? I've been using K+N Air filters for several huindred thousand miles on two of my 4 wheel vehicles and on my Custom 1988 FLH harley for 70,000 miles. I've done top end tear down and inspection on the Harley and it looks brand new inside, and no visable or MEASURABLE wear on the cylinders. Seems they work just fine in the Turbo Tracker too.

I'm also TURBOCHARGED on the STOCK rods and pistons, liquid to air intercooled, and have been for over 30,000 miles without a problem. Keep the boost below 6lbs and your golden. Just ask anyone who's riddin in mine, it's plenty quick and RELIABLE.
on the turbocharging, I figue a number closer to 10+ pounds of boost, and k&N is prettywell proven in the moto world to be crap.  I'll run BMC over thse things.

*

Offline bentparts

  • *
  • 4536
  • 60
  • Gender: Male
  • I'd rather be Blown AND Injected.
    • mikekallie's flickr photos
Re: more power for sidekick
« Reply #10 on: April 06, 2010, 02:01:27 PM »
Again Bob, Proven By Whom?
The usual stuff, and 2nd generation Air to liquid intercooled TURBOCHARGER

Re: more power for sidekick
« Reply #11 on: April 06, 2010, 09:37:34 PM »
I've run K&N's on motorcycles, snowmobiles, cars and trucks all with no problems.  When they first came out for bikes there was testing done that showed an oiled filter trapped dirt as well as paper and when it got dirty it filtered better.  I've also used foam based filters and they don't flow like a K&N.

Re: more power for sidekick
« Reply #12 on: April 07, 2010, 06:24:33 AM »
Again Bob, Proven By Whom?

I'm going to have to agree on the side of K&N being a good product. Please send us links to independent tests/studies defending your argument. Saying that you can't have enough filtration without restriction is like saying that the only way to increase power is to increase displacement. K&N's flow better with the same filtration because its not a glorified paper coffee filter or glorified kitchen sponge (foam) but a nice tight knit cotton allowing free flowing tubes that would let dirt pass through if not for the oil for collection. The only bad thing I've ever heard resulting from K&N filters is over oiling gunking up a MAF sensor.

*

Offline Rhinoman

  • 4502
  • 36
  • Gender: Male
  • Bend it, Break it, Fix it
    • Rhinoman
Re: more power for sidekick
« Reply #13 on: April 07, 2010, 11:21:45 AM »
K&N filters are rubbish at filtering dust and very fine particles. They are better when they are dirty but the flow rate drops off dramatically. For outright flow then clean and oiled they are probably the best filter. I did dyno tests on a number of filters a few years ago but that was for a racing bike so max. filtration wasn't an issue I just wanted to keep out the worst stuff.
Theres an independant test here and I'm sure there will be a few more if you search:

http://www.bobistheoilguy.com/airfilter/airtest3.htm


Tight knit? try holding one up to a light.
2000 Vitara 1.6, 3+3 Lift, 33"MTs, 5:83s, LWB brakes, Winch, Snorkel, Safari Rack
1986 SJ413K PickUp, 1.6L conversion.

OBD1 - Full diagnostics on a PC/Laptop: http://www.rhinopower.org

*

Offline bentparts

  • *
  • 4536
  • 60
  • Gender: Male
  • I'd rather be Blown AND Injected.
    • mikekallie's flickr photos
Re: more power for sidekick
« Reply #14 on: April 07, 2010, 02:31:19 PM »
Rhinoman I've always respected your opinions and knowledge, and would tend to agree with you on this except for one thing: you seem to contradict yourself when stating " they are rubbish at filtering dust and fine particles"  then later in the same sentence you state:" for outright flow, then clean and oiled they are probably the best filter." I use K+N filters particularly because they are CLEANABLE, easily actually, and easy to re oil. Now I may agree that ultra fine dust may get by , but if its that fine it's not going to do any real damage to the motor, especially if you observe regular oil changes with good oil. I've also done dyno comparisons between K+N, Harley's own performance brand Screaming eagle, and stock filters, and the K+N out performs all, properly clean and oiled. Who would put one in not properly cleaned and oiled? I probably wouldn't use one on a pure dirt ( motocross/enduro) bike, only because it would require more maintenance. The oiled foam filters are better at keeping out water from the airbox too, but clog up real fast. I had a Calmini oiled foam filter, and found a noticeable increase in throttle response when I switched to K+N. Besides, Calmini has no real instructions on cleaning and oiling there filters, and when I asked the sales rep he said NO oil. Might as well stuff the airbox with a rag.

PS, on my old road race bikes we used velocity stacks, air filter? what air filter! Of course today's bikes have sophisticated air boxes and really good breathing systems so an air filter really doesn't hurt flow too much. OH, and did you buy anything from "BOB"?
The usual stuff, and 2nd generation Air to liquid intercooled TURBOCHARGER