At a glance those numbers are good, but the point that TioPick is making, and it's a very valid point, is that we don't know how the compression test was done. I'm not singling you out here, but many people do not know the right way to do a compression test, and one of the questions he asked, or alluded to, was whether those numbers were wet or dry - and that question has not been answered.
The validity of a compression test is not really what the number say, but how the numbers change, between the wet & dry tests, and also from cylinder to cylinder.
So - on the surface of it, those numbers are within spec., but, with no more information than what has been provided, there is very little we can tell you.
For what it's worth, I had a Suzuki G13 engine with a little over 120k miles on it, essentially the same engine that you're looking at, but not from a Samurai, with compression numbers into the 190's, so apparently well within spec., but the engine was woefully down on power, because the rings were worn - maybe I should mention that those 190's were wet test numbers, the dry test numbers were in the 100~120 psi range.
