Hello Guest

Engine choices for swap

  • 36 Replies
  • 6918 Views

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

*

Offline explosivo

  • 3157
  • 0
  • Gender: Male
  • I'm in the northern part of that one state.
    • omghi2u Gen. Discussion Forums
Engine choices for swap
« on: June 06, 2005, 11:08:10 AM »
Okay, now that I am in the beginning stages of my SAS swap, I'm already thinking of bigger and better engines. Not particularly thinking of a different four cyl, but something with a little more 'oomph', like a V6 or V8. Problem is, I don't want it to be extraordinarily heavy, so engines like the 350 sbc are probably out, due to weight. Now what I'm thinking is Aluminum V6's that came in 2wd configuration, so I could use the original trans and put a Sammy t-case behind it (I'd assume that most stock V6's won't be too hard on a Sammy case.

So, let's make up a list of 2wd (or 4wd with pass. side front output and fixed yokes) aluminum V6's or other plausable Trackick engine swaps :)
omghi2.us[/url]
"Its a ZUKI thing. Doing more with less than less with more." -- HotRod

*

Offline DaddyDave

  • 204
  • 0
  • Gender: Male
  • Indeed
Re: Engine choices for swap
« Reply #1 on: June 06, 2005, 11:20:36 AM »
4.3L Vortech...why not take the guesswork out and talk to Al |removethispart|@ Suzuki Lightning.   His work is second to none.
"The maximum effective range of an excuse is 0.0 meters."

*

Offline zaggy

  • 1134
  • 2
  • Gender: Male
Re: Engine choices for swap
« Reply #2 on: June 06, 2005, 11:23:37 AM »
     I've always liked the Nissan VG30 (SOHC) that came in the pick ups and the 300ZX.......they both came with RWD 5spd's.  300ZX also came with turbo's.


Zag
92 Sidekick 4dr, Suzuki Powered Airplane

*

Offline explosivo

  • 3157
  • 0
  • Gender: Male
  • I'm in the northern part of that one state.
    • omghi2u Gen. Discussion Forums
Re: Engine choices for swap
« Reply #3 on: June 06, 2005, 11:28:39 AM »
Quote
4.3L Vortech...why not take the guesswork out and talk to Al |removethispart|@ Suzuki Lightning.   His work is second to none.

4.3 might be an option, since it's readily available. Anyone know what side the output is on, or if it has slip yokes or fixed yokes?

I've heard nothing but negative things when it comes to people's opinions on Lightning's work, plus I prefer to do the work myself. I find the work more fun than the resulting vehicle, anyway :P

Nissans are few and far between on the roads up here, so I'd assume that they'll be pretty rare in the salvage yards, too :-/
« Last Edit: June 06, 2005, 11:29:54 AM by explosivo »
omghi2.us[/url]
"Its a ZUKI thing. Doing more with less than less with more." -- HotRod

*

Offline jzap

  • 515
  • 2
  • Gender: Male
  • How difficult can it be?
Re: Engine choices for swap
« Reply #4 on: June 06, 2005, 11:46:44 AM »
If you don't have to worry about emission testing...

GM made a 215 cid (what's that, about 3.6 litres?) aluminum V-8 and a 198 cid aluminum V-6 that it put in the early '60's Buicks.  

Hard to find, but I think it might be worth a look (unless you are put off by the fact that J**p used the buick V-6 in the late '60's).
Jim Z.
96 Tracker
66 Apache camper

*

Offline DaddyDave

  • 204
  • 0
  • Gender: Male
  • Indeed
Re: Engine choices for swap
« Reply #5 on: June 06, 2005, 11:59:51 AM »
Quote

I've heard nothing but negative things when it comes to people's opinions on Lightning's work, plus I prefer to do the work myself. I find the work more fun than the resulting vehicle, anyway :P


were these people actually customers of his who paid good money to have the work done, or were they guys were tried to pick his brain for free while they built all the parts at home and then got pissed when he didn't give them all the secrets?!  Keep that in mind also.  As far as his work is concerned, I have seen many of them in person and they look cleaner than factory.  Hell, he even paints the firewall to match.
"The maximum effective range of an excuse is 0.0 meters."

*

Offline Chief

  • 678
  • 0
  • Gender: Male
  • Whaddya lookin at??
Re: Engine choices for swap
« Reply #6 on: June 06, 2005, 12:12:05 PM »
I've been dreaming of either the 2.3 outta a ford (which is about double the HP and trq of the 8v), or a 4.0 V6 outta a Ford. 160hp and 220 lb ft of trq qould be PLENTY. Should be able to just idle most everything! Just pull one of those 2 out of a 2wd Ranger/explorer, get the wiring harness, ECU, etc, and you're off to the races!!  ;D
03 Tacoma, BBP sliders, TRD L/S, Modded intake,  Da Tow Bitch

94 Tracker. Cancer mod :p Otherwise stock

*

Offline mesjr2004

  • 422
  • 0
  • Gender: Male
Re: Engine choices for swap
« Reply #7 on: June 06, 2005, 12:19:34 PM »
if i had the cash id gow with a vw v6 . stock hp is around 180. and it is a verry narrow motor . it only has 1 head .and the motor is verry realiable . i had one in my getta glx vr6 . that thing would run 150 mph . and is verry tourkey

*

Offline ack

  • 1659
  • 34
  • Gender: Male
  • Professional askhole
    • Ack's FAQ
Re: Engine choices for swap
« Reply #8 on: June 06, 2005, 01:04:38 PM »
Quote
I've been dreaming of either the 2.3 outta a ford (which is about double the HP and trq of the 8v)...


This has been done, but the whole package (block & trannie) is very long and requires a lot of shoehorning.

Mmmmm, Turbo.....

Quote
... or a 4.0 V6 outta a Ford. 160hp and 220 lb ft of trq qould be PLENTY. Should be able to just idle most everything! Just pull one of those 2 out of a 2wd Ranger/explorer, get the wiring harness, ECU, etc, and you're off to the races!!  ;D


Someone over at ORC recently did this install.  Here's a URL:

http://bbs.off-road.com/ubbthreads/showflat.php?Cat=0&Board=offroadsuzuki&Number=1417968&Searchpage=2&Main=1417968&Words=4.0+swap&topic=&Search=true#Post1417968


Ack

'88 Samurai, '88.5 Samurai TT, '11 Ford Transit Connect XLT
Ack's FAQ  http://www.acksfaq.com

*

Offline zaggy

  • 1134
  • 2
  • Gender: Male
Re: Engine choices for swap
« Reply #9 on: June 06, 2005, 03:44:40 PM »
Ah come on guys
    2.3 Pinto/Mustang, the Suzuki 2.0L has more horse power and torque...........lets get physco.....Talon 2.0l turbo with intercooler, chip and uprated boost control. Should bolt up to the RWD trans from the Dodge D-50 or old Plymouth Challenger.....drove a freinds that we did some work for...250hp in an all wheel drive...but not cheap.

    On the slightly less insane....how about a low boost 2.0L/Multi point injection...should get around 175hp and stay all Suzuki...What do you think Wildgoody?

Zag
92 Sidekick 4dr, Suzuki Powered Airplane

*

Offline 92Sidekick4x4

  • 1456
  • 0
  • Gender: Male
  • Spencer Atkinson, 92Sidekick4x4
Re: Engine choices for swap
« Reply #10 on: June 06, 2005, 06:25:29 PM »
if i had the money/skills i think i would liek to keep the 1.6L 8 vAlve, totally rebuild it new pistons cam etc. and put some NOS in it for fun, and eveyrthing else re built etc.

my lug nuts require more torque then my engine makes ;)

*

Offline explosivo

  • 3157
  • 0
  • Gender: Male
  • I'm in the northern part of that one state.
    • omghi2u Gen. Discussion Forums
Re: Engine choices for swap
« Reply #11 on: June 06, 2005, 11:05:27 PM »
Quote
were these people actually customers of his who paid good money to have the work done, or were they guys were tried to pick his brain for free while they built all the parts at home and then got pissed when he didn't give them all the secrets?!  Keep that in mind also.  As far as his work is concerned, I have seen many of them in person and they look cleaner than factory.  Hell, he even paints the firewall to match.

Just comments about different people's impressions of the quality of workmanship that's come out of that shop. I have no experience with them personally, nor do I know anyone who does, but like I said earlier, I like to do my own work :)

And a reminder, the original intent of the thread is looking for V6's and V8's that don't weigh a shit-ton. Not 4cyls. If I wanted a 4cyl, I'd use the Nissan Z engine I have sitting in my garage ;)

Something that I thought about at work: a 4.3 (Vortec or not) mated to a SM420 or 465 (whatever the fourspeed transmission in 80's GM trucks was called) with the transfercase that came in the truck (as long as it has fixed yokes). Does anyone know if the 4.3 has the same bellhouse pattern as other SBCs? Are teh clutches/pressure plates/flywheels interchangable?
« Last Edit: June 06, 2005, 11:10:06 PM by explosivo »
omghi2.us[/url]
"Its a ZUKI thing. Doing more with less than less with more." -- HotRod

*

Offline 1bigtracker

  • 3409
  • 1
  • Gender: Male
  • F*** trail rated, try trail tested
Re: Engine choices for swap
« Reply #12 on: June 06, 2005, 11:34:33 PM »
Quote
Ah come on guys
    2.3 Pinto/Mustang, the Suzuki 2.0L has more horse power and torque...........lets get physco.....Talon 2.0l turbo with intercooler, chip and uprated boost control. Should bolt up to the RWD trans from the Dodge D-50 or old Plymouth Challenger.....drove a freinds that we did some work for...250hp in an all wheel drive...but not cheap.

i've already looked into it. you would need to mod the oil pan. Bushur Racing makes a plate to bolt it to a chevy auto trans ;)
http://www.buschurracing.com/cgi-bin/ez-catalog/cat_display.cgi?31X376545


stu
« Last Edit: June 06, 2005, 11:36:22 PM by 1bigtracker »
   

*

Offline ebewley

  • 6555
  • 64
  • Gender: Male
  • ZUKIWORLD Online, Editor
    • ZUKIWORLD online
Re: Engine choices for swap
« Reply #13 on: June 07, 2005, 01:42:59 AM »
Quote



And a reminder, the original intent of the thread is looking for V6's and V8's that don't weigh a shit-ton. Not 4cyls. If I wanted a 4cyl, I'd use the Nissan Z engine I have sitting in my garage ;)


Why not stay Suzuki? ;) The 2.7 liter engine with 185 hp motivates a Sidekick just fine and it is possible to use all Suzuki drivetrain with out any adapters or other BS. Of course there's the 4.3 blah blah blah but other than a vortec version it is actually down on power to the 2.7 and weighs a whole lot more. Especially if one detunes it by changin to a carburator.  ;D  

For a comparison of weight there is a certain Sidekick from an owner here on the board that is running 35 inch krawlers, Calmini armor, and a 1.6 16valve w/5speed whilst I am running 33 inch MTRs, Calmini armor, and a 2.7 V6 w/auto the difference in weight between the two vehicles is less than 75 pounds!

FWIW: Stick with Suzuki drivetrain it is worth it. :)

-Eric
Eric L. Bewley                               
Editor, ZUKIWORLD Online                   

Suzuki 4x4 Owners Association - Please Join  The ZUKIWORLD ORDER Today!
About ZUKIWORLD Online: We are an enthusiast web site dedicated to the promotion of the Suzuki Automobile as the best and most capable vehicle on the planet. We offer product reviews, Tech tips, DIY, Travel and Adventure, Forum, Technical information, Life Style, and so much more!

*

Offline chet

  • 556
  • 0
  • Zuki time!
Re: Engine choices for swap
« Reply #14 on: June 07, 2005, 04:43:33 AM »
the 4.3 has the same bellhousing bolt pattern as SBC's the pre'87 use the early flywheels and the '87 later use the new style crank seal so the flywheel is different (not hard to find though) they are not that light of an engine.

As for the tranny. I think for weight wise the NV3500 from a s10 with the 4.3 would be the best bet. the sm465/420 are huge and really heavy!! They are meant for 1 ton trucks!

As for tcases if you use a 2wd tranny it will be really long. you can get adapters to mate the chev tranny to a toyota tcase and you can also get adapters to mate the chev bellhousing to a toyota tranny and tcase.

If you use chev tcase you have a few choices.
NP205=heavy and bad low range of 1.9:1
np203=even heavier and HUGE!
Dana 300 is prob a good bet.
np235 from a s series. drivers side drop though. Also they have skip yoke rear outputs.
np241/5 from 1 ton chevs have drivers drop and fixed yokes.

for weight comparison I had a toyota with 4.3/sm465/np205 and toyota axles and 37" tires and it was almost 5000 lbs!!! some of that was the heavy box I had on it so call it 4500 lbs.!

I figured by swapping to a nv3500 I could get 5th gear and mate it to a dana 300 this would have given lower low range (after changing diff gears) and saved me 250 lbs.
1991 4 door kick, 2" coil spacers, 30" Coopers, winch, locker, rust, dents, etc.